Reasons why it's not always possible to carry out one hundred percent quality control inspections in China

Comments · 137 Views

The more frequently they are carried out, the greater the likelihood that defects will be found in the system

The more frequently they are carried out, the greater the likelihood that defects will be found in the system. This is the reason why an increasing number of buyers do not want to use the traditional international AQL standard, which consists of random inspections, and this is also the reason why this standard has been around for so long. Because purchasers have less faith that their suppliers are producing their goods at a consistent and adequate inspections companies level, they are more likely to scrutinize each and every one of their acquisitions before making a purchase decision. Even though it might appear to be the approach that covers the most ground, carrying out a check that is one hundred percent accurate might not necessarily result in the most accurate findings. The following are five reasons why it's possible that 100% inspections won't be as effective as they could be:

 

 

 

Exorbitant prices

  • The fact that performing piece-by-piece quality inspection china  control inspections requires a significant amount of manual labor should go without saying; however, it is important to note

  • You shouldn't be surprised by the fact that QC companies are hesitant to fulfill this special request because it is not surprising to find that they are unwilling to do so

  • In the extremely unlikely event that you come across one that does, you can be certain that the asking price will be rather steep

     

Setting unreasonable deadlines and expecting people to meet them.

There is no way around the undeniable fact that your production will be slowed down to some degree if you have a 100% inspection rate. In order to secure a buyer's business, inspection managers frequently give in to a buyer's unreasonable demands regarding the timeline for completing an inspection. These holiday periods are already notorious for production delays, which are then compounded when a QC inspection rate of 100 percent is requested. Case in point: Case in point:This adds an additional burden to the shoulders of the people whose responsibility it is to conduct the inspection, which brings us to our next point:

 

 

As was mentioned in the previous section, setting deadlines that are impossible to meet can encourage inspectors to take shortcuts, which can result in a catastrophe further down the line. In the event that inspectors are pressed for time to carry out a 100% quality audit control inspection, they will frequently check fewer samples than they should in an effort to finish the task in a timely manner. This is because checking fewer samples takes less time than checking the appropriate number of samples.

It's possible that the inspections and tests that are carried out by quality control will ruin your product. For example, products that have inherent properties that need to be tested, such as samples of non-shatter glass or borosilicate glass, will need to be removed from production in order to be evaluated for their properties. This may require additional time and resources. In essence, they need to be removed from the equation, and then they should be put through tests that are intended to break them. Because this kind of testing has the potential to render your product unsellable after it has been evaluated, you will need to take this into consideration when determining the quantity of products that you will need to buy in order to meet your needs.

Human error and fatigue

As you might imagine, carrying out 100% Inspections can require a considerable amount of effort in addition to a considerable amount of time. This frequently leads to exhaustion, human error, and, as a consequence, the detection of a lower quality. As a result, the detection rate is higher.

This is a common occurrence that takes place when productions consisting of thousands of units are asked to undergo quality inspections that cover one hundred percent of the product. A 100% inspection carried out on an order that only contains 200 units will undoubtedly be a great deal less difficult to carry out than an inspection carried out on an order that only contains 5,000 units.

When you place your first order with a new factory, you should inform them that you will be having your production inspected and that it will be a 100% inspection of all units. You should also let them know that this information will be communicated to them before you place your order. In addition to that, you need to let them know that you will be providing them with the results of the inspection at some point in the near future. This may encourage them to put in additional effort to ensure that their Pre-Shipment Inspection management system and in-house quality control are up to par, which could help ensure that they do so. To take this a step further, you need to make it a priority to incorporate high-quality clauses into the purchase agreements that you draft. If the supplier is aware that they will have to overcompensate you for any defects or inspection failures, they are more likely to get it right the first time around and not have to overcompensate you later.

So, what course of action is recommended? In the production of goods like promotional items, which do not need to be of the highest quality, one hundred percent inspections have no place. This is because these goods do not need to be of the highest quality. Except in the case where you want to use this kind of inspection for a new supplier on a small order, which is not recommended and was just explained.

If time is not necessarily of the utmost importance, then inspecting your product on a piece-by-piece basis might also make sense. Give yourself and your inspectors enough time to inspect your products, but keep in mind that inspections are typically billed per man-day (with prices ranging from approximately $250 to $300), rather than being billed per total quantity of units.

Before deciding whether or not you should subject all of your products to a 100 percent quality control inspection, it is up to you to weigh the potential benefits of doing so against the associated costs of doing so. The only circumstances in which it makes sense to carry out this kind of inspection as a standard practice are a small subset of the total number of conceivable situations.


Comments